Re: And the v6.11 pull request will come from me

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 10:09, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Please let me know of any questions or concerns.

Ack, all sounds good.

And it wasn't a problem last time either, I just wanted to make it
clear that I don't want to randomly pull from new people without
having some kind of hand-over.

And everybody reacted very quickly with a "yup, all good" (which I
obviously _expected_ it to be - I just wanted the explicit ack), so
all it did was delay my pull request by literally a couple of minutes.

I was going to write that it delayed things by "a few hours", but I
went back and checked: I asked for a handoff confirmation email at
9:38, and I got your reply at 9:46, and my merge commit is dated 9:49,
all the same morning.

So it literally delayed things by like 11 minutes on a pull request
that was nice and timely.

This was all the opposite of a problem. Just an oversight that worked
out very quickly.

In fact, even in my "I really want to see proper heads-up" email I also wrote:

  [ I should have reacted to this earlier, but I just put all the "for
    6.10" pull requests in the queue without looking closer ]

so quite arguably even that 11-minute delay was my fault for not
having reacted when the original pull request came in, and only
reacting once the merge window started and I started processing it.

               Linus




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux