Re: [BUG] TREE04 hang on 6.5.y stable: Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 7:33 AM Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 6:28 PM Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 1:59 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 09:17:15AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > Just started seeing this on 6.5 stable. It is new and first occurrence:
> > > >
> > > > TREE04 no success message, 234 successful version messages
> > > >  [033mWARNING:  [mTREE04 GP HANG at 14 torture stat 2
> > > > [   38.371120] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g1253
> > > > f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6
> > > > [   38.388342] Call Trace:
> > > > [   53.741039] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g3637
> > > > f0x2 ->state 0x2 cpu 6
> > > > [   69.093462] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g5501
> > > > f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6
> > > > [   84.450028] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g10505
> > > > f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6
> > > > [   99.815871] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g13781
> > > > f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6
> > > > [  115.166476] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g16544
> > > > f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6
> > > > [  130.550116] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g18941
> > > > f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6
> > > > [..]
> > > >
> > > > All logs:
> > > > http://box.joelfernandes.org:9080/job/rcutorture_stable/job/linux-6.5.y/17/artifact/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/res/2023.09.07-04.10.25/TREE04/
> > >
> > > Huh.  Does this happen for you in v6.5 mainline?
> > Hi, I am started torture.sh in a kvm environment (with nested kvm
> > enable) in my Intel  i7-1165G7 laptop, which can be examined at
> > runtime:
> > http://154.220.3.120:8080/test/linux-stable/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/res/2023.09.08-10.23.47-torture/
> again I can't reproduce the bug in my environment, I will try it more times.
besides my laptop, I also started the test on PPC vm of Open Source
lab of Oregon State University:
http://140.211.169.189/stable/linux/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/res/2023.09.09-00.07.55-torture/
> the git head is  3766ec12cf89
>
> System stability is a profound knowledge, there is too much for me to
> learn from the community.
> Thanks
> Zhouyi
> >
> > Hope I can be of some beneficial
> > Thanks
> > Zhouyi
> > >
> > > Both the code under test (full-state polled grace periods) and the
> > > rcutorture test code are fairly new, so there is some reason for general
> > > suspicion.  ;-)
> > >
> > >                                                         Thanx, Paul




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux