On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 6:28 PM Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 1:59 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 09:17:15AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > > Hi, > > > Just started seeing this on 6.5 stable. It is new and first occurrence: > > > > > > TREE04 no success message, 234 successful version messages > > > [033mWARNING: [mTREE04 GP HANG at 14 torture stat 2 > > > [ 38.371120] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g1253 > > > f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6 > > > [ 38.388342] Call Trace: > > > [ 53.741039] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g3637 > > > f0x2 ->state 0x2 cpu 6 > > > [ 69.093462] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g5501 > > > f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6 > > > [ 84.450028] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g10505 > > > f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6 > > > [ 99.815871] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g13781 > > > f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6 > > > [ 115.166476] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g16544 > > > f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6 > > > [ 130.550116] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g18941 > > > f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6 > > > [..] > > > > > > All logs: > > > http://box.joelfernandes.org:9080/job/rcutorture_stable/job/linux-6.5.y/17/artifact/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/res/2023.09.07-04.10.25/TREE04/ > > > > Huh. Does this happen for you in v6.5 mainline? > Hi, I am started torture.sh in a kvm environment (with nested kvm > enable) in my Intel i7-1165G7 laptop, which can be examined at > runtime: > http://154.220.3.120:8080/test/linux-stable/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/res/2023.09.08-10.23.47-torture/ again I can't reproduce the bug in my environment, I will try it more times. the git head is 3766ec12cf89 System stability is a profound knowledge, there is too much for me to learn from the community. Thanks Zhouyi > > Hope I can be of some beneficial > Thanks > Zhouyi > > > > Both the code under test (full-state polled grace periods) and the > > rcutorture test code are fairly new, so there is some reason for general > > suspicion. ;-) > > > > Thanx, Paul
