On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 11:04:04PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > > On 7/26/23 17:07, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >> - free_percpu(ssp->sda); > >> - ssp->sda = NULL; > >> - kfree(ssp->srcu_sup); > >> - return -ENOMEM; > >> - } > >> - } else { > >> + if (!init_srcu_struct_nodes(ssp, GFP_ATOMIC)) > >> + goto err_free_sda; > >> + else > >> WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_size_state, SRCU_SIZE_BIG); > > Given that the "then" clause is a goto, what is the "else" clause doing > > for us? > > > > Not much. Agreed we can get rid of "else" and reduce indent of the > WRITE_ONCE that follows. > > Would you mind making this fixup in the patch for your apply, or would > you like me to refresh the patch? Let me know either way, thank you! Please include it with your next series, which has at least one other change anyway. ;-) Thanx, Paul