On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 07:05:58PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 5:15 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Ah. So you would instead look for boot to have completed within 10 > > seconds? Either way, reliable automation might well more important than > > reduction in time. > > No (although I guess that could be an option), I was only pointing out > that when no stall is produced, the run should be much quicker than 30 > seconds (at least it was in my setup), which would be the majority of the runs. Ah, thank you for the clarification! Thanx, Paul
