On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 5:15 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ah. So you would instead look for boot to have completed within 10 > seconds? Either way, reliable automation might well more important than > reduction in time. No (although I guess that could be an option), I was only pointing out that when no stall is produced, the run should be much quicker than 30 seconds (at least it was in my setup), which would be the majority of the runs. Cheers, Miguel
