Should RCU_BOOST kernels use hrtimers in GP kthread?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, Sebastian,

I punted on this for the moment by making RCU priority boosting testing
depend on CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT, but longer term I am wondering if RCU's
various timed delays and timeouts should use hrtimers rather than normal
timers in kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_BOOST.  As it is, RCU priority
boosting can be defeated if any of the RCU grace-period kthread's timeouts
are serviced by the non-realtime ksoftirqd.

This might require things like swait_event_idle_hrtimeout_exclusive(),
either as primitives or just open coded.

Thoughts?

							Thanx, Paul



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux