On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 09:02:53PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2020-07-14 11:27:32 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > I believe that Ulad and Joel are working on an update. > > I expressed multiple times that I am unhappy with the raw_spinlock_t > which both want to keep. It is important to be future proof but at the > same time I am not sure if they know how many in-hardirq kmalloc() or > kfree() invocation we have as of today in PREEMPT_RT. > I also had a patch in my series to keep the lock/unlock path symmetrical > and it I think that I the only one that is missing it. Are you good with giving Ulad a few days to produce his patch? We do have at least a week or two before the merge window opens, after all. Thanx, Paul
