On 2020-07-14 11:27:32 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote: > I believe that Ulad and Joel are working on an update. I expressed multiple times that I am unhappy with the raw_spinlock_t which both want to keep. It is important to be future proof but at the same time I am not sure if they know how many in-hardirq kmalloc() or kfree() invocation we have as of today in PREEMPT_RT. I also had a patch in my series to keep the lock/unlock path symmetrical and it I think that I the only one that is missing it. > Thanx, Paul Sebastian
