Re: atomic queue limit updates for stackable devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



CC Benjamin, Zdenek, and Xiao, who are running the lvm tests.

On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 7:36 AM Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27 2024 at 10:17P -0500,
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:16:39AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > That's the mainline issue a bunch of MD (and dm-raid) oriented
> > > engineers are working hard to fix, they've been discussing on
> > > linux-raid (with many iterations of proposed patches).
> > >
> > > It regressed due to 6.8 MD changes (maybe earlier).
> >
> >
> > Do you know if there is a way to skip specific tests to get a useful
> > baseline value (and to complete the run?)
>
> I only know to sprinkle 'skip' code around to explicitly force the
> test to get skipped (e.g. in test/shell/, adding 'skip' at the top of
> each test as needed).

I think we can do something like:

make check S=<list of test to skip>

I don't have a reliable list to skip at the moment, as some of the tests
fail on some systems but not on others. However, per early report,
I guess we can start with the following skip list:

shell/integrity-caching.sh
shell/lvconvert-raid-reshape-linear_to_raid6-single-type.sh
shell/lvconvert-raid-reshape.sh

Thanks,
Song





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux