Are you sure you did not partition devices that did not previously have partition tables? Partition tables will typically cause the under device (sda) to be ignored by all of tools since it should never having something else (except the partition table) on it. I have had to remove incorrectly added partition tables/blocks to make lvm and other tools again see the data. Otherwise the tools ignore it. On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 12:06 PM RJ Marquette <rjm1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Other than sdc (as you noted), the other array drives come back like this: > > root@jackie:/etc/mdadm# mdadm --examine /dev/sda > /dev/sda: > MBR Magic : aa55 > Partition[0] : 4294967295 sectors at 1 (type ee) > > root@jackie:/etc/mdadm# mdadm --examine /dev/sda1 > mdadm: No md superblock detected on /dev/sda1. > > > Trying your other suggestion: > root@jackie:/etc/mdadm# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sdg1 > mdadm: no recogniseable superblock on /dev/sdb1 > mdadm: /dev/sdb1 has no superblock - assembly aborted > > root@jackie:/etc/mdadm# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/sdb /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg > mdadm: Cannot assemble mbr metadata on /dev/sdb > mdadm: /dev/sdb has no superblock - assembly aborted > > > Basically I've tried everything here: https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Linux_Raid > > The impression I'm getting here is that we aren't really sure what the issue is. I think tonight I'll play with some of the BIOS settings and see if there's something in there. If not I'll swap back to the old motherboard and see what happens. > > Thanks. > --RJ > > > > > > On Wednesday, January 24, 2024 at 12:06:26 PM EST, Sandro <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On 24-01-2024 13:17, RJ Marquette wrote: > > > When I try the command you suggested below, I get: > > root@jackie:/etc/mdadm# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/sd{a,b,e,f,g}1 > > mdadm: no recogniseable superblock on /dev/sda1 > > mdadm: /dev/sda1 has no superblock - assembly aborted > > > Try `mdadm --examine` on every partition / drive that is giving you > trouble. Maybe you are remembering things wrong and the raid device is > /dev/sda and not /dev/sda1. > > You can also go through the entire list (/dev/sd*), you posted earlier. > There's no harm in running the command. It will look for the superblock > and tell you what has been found. This could provide the information you > need to assemble the array. > > Alternatively, leave sda1 out of the assembly and see if mdadm will be > able to partially assemble the array. > > -- Sandro >
