Re: [PATCH mdadm] tests: Gate tests for linear flavor with variable LINEAR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21.12.2023 02:39, Song Liu wrote:

linear flavor is being removed in the kernel [1], so tests for the linear
flavor will fail. Gate tests for linear flavor with LINEAR=yes, so that we
can still run these tests for older kernels.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/20231214222107.2016042-1-song@xxxxxxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tests/00linear     | 5 +++++
  tests/00names      | 8 +++++++-
  tests/00raid0      | 4 ++++
  tests/00readonly   | 8 +++++++-
  tests/02lineargrow | 5 +++++
  tests/03assem-incr | 8 +++++++-
  tests/03r0assem    | 4 ++++
  tests/04r0update   | 6 ++++++
  8 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/00linear b/tests/00linear
index e3ac6555c9dd..5a1160851af2 100644
--- a/tests/00linear
+++ b/tests/00linear
@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
# create a simple linear +if [ "$LINEAR" != "yes" ]; then
+  echo -ne 'skipping... '
+  exit 0
+fi
+
  mdadm -CR $md0 -l linear -n3 $dev0 $dev1 $dev2
  check linear
  testdev $md0 3 $mdsize2_l 1
diff --git a/tests/00names b/tests/00names
index 7a066d8fb2b7..d996befc5e8b 100644
--- a/tests/00names
+++ b/tests/00names
@@ -4,7 +4,13 @@ set -x -e
  conf=$targetdir/mdadm.conf
  echo "CREATE names=yes" > $conf
-for i in linear raid0 raid1 raid4 raid5 raid6
+levels=(raid0 raid1 raid4 raid5 raid6)
+
+if [ "$LINEAR" == "yes" ]; then
+  levels+=( linear )
+fi
+
+for i in ${levels[@]}
  do
    mdadm -CR --config $conf /dev/md/$i -l $i -n 4 $dev4 $dev3 $dev2 $dev1
    check $i
diff --git a/tests/00raid0 b/tests/00raid0
index 9b8896cbdc52..6407c320fd65 100644
--- a/tests/00raid0
+++ b/tests/00raid0
@@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ check raid0
  testdev $md0 5 $size 512
  mdadm -S $md0
+if [ "$LINEAR" != "yes" ]; then
+  echo -ne 'skipping... '
+  exit 0
+fi
# now same again with different chunk size
  for chunk in 4 32 256
diff --git a/tests/00readonly b/tests/00readonly
index afe243b3a0b0..80b63629e4f9 100644
--- a/tests/00readonly
+++ b/tests/00readonly
@@ -1,8 +1,14 @@
  #!/bin/bash
+levels=(raid0 raid1 raid4 raid5 raid6 raid10)
+
+if [ "$LINEAR" == "yes" ]; then
+  levels+=( linear )
+fi
+
  for metadata in 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2
  do
-	for level in linear raid0 raid1 raid4 raid5 raid6 raid10
+	for level in ${levels[@]}
  	do
  		if [[ $metadata == "0.9" && $level == "raid0" ]];
  		then
diff --git a/tests/02lineargrow b/tests/02lineargrow
index 595bf9f20802..d17e2326d13f 100644
--- a/tests/02lineargrow
+++ b/tests/02lineargrow
@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
# create a liner array, and add more drives to to. +if [ "$LINEAR" != "yes" ]; then
+  echo -ne 'skipping... '
+  exit 0
+fi
+
  for e in 0.90 1 1.1 1.2
  do
    case $e in
diff --git a/tests/03assem-incr b/tests/03assem-incr
index f10a1a48ee5c..38880a7fed10 100644
--- a/tests/03assem-incr
+++ b/tests/03assem-incr
@@ -6,7 +6,13 @@ set -x -e
  # Here just test that a partly "-I" assembled array can
  # be completed with "-A"
-for l in 0 1 5 linear
+levels=(raid0 raid1 raid5)
+
+if [ "$LINEAR" == "yes" ]; then
+  levels+=( linear )
+fi
+
+for l in ${levels[@]}
  do
    mdadm -CR $md0 -l $l -n5 $dev0 $dev1 $dev2 $dev3 $dev4 --assume-clean
    mdadm -S md0
diff --git a/tests/03r0assem b/tests/03r0assem
index 44df06456233..f7c29e8c1ab6 100644
--- a/tests/03r0assem
+++ b/tests/03r0assem
@@ -64,6 +64,10 @@ mdadm --assemble --scan --config=$conf $md2
  $tst
  mdadm -S $md2
+if [ "$LINEAR" != "yes" ]; then
+  echo -ne 'skipping... '
+  exit 0
+fi
### Now for version 0... diff --git a/tests/04r0update b/tests/04r0update
index b95efb06c761..c495f34a0a79 100644
--- a/tests/04r0update
+++ b/tests/04r0update
@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
# create a raid0, re-assemble with a different super-minor
+
+if [ "$LINEAR" != "yes" ]; then
+  echo -ne 'skipping... '
+  exit 0
+fi
+
  mdadm -CR -e 0.90 $md0 -llinear -n3 $dev0 $dev1 $dev2
  testdev $md0 3 $mdsize0 1
  minor1=`mdadm -E $dev0 | sed -n -e 's/.*Preferred Minor : //p'`
Hi Song, this approach looks a bit dirty to me as it's omitting what's already in the test suite. I would prefer adding additional param rather than setting environment variable, so test execution flow stays unified (as far as I'm aware we do not use flags for now). Adding param is also a good excuse to explain why linear is not tested by default in "--help".

Another thing is "--raidtype=linear" option, is probably redundant now.

Thanks, Mateusz





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux