Re: SMR or SSD disks?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



yes i know, but the most common SSD size is 1.92 , at least here in my country.

and the raid i have to upgrade is made with 2tb spinning disks.

(i don't have support for nvme on these old servers)

Il giorno lun 27 nov 2023 alle ore 00:08 Gandalf Corvotempesta
<gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
>
> yes i know, but the most common SSD size is 1.92 , at least here in my country.
>
> and the raid i have to upgrade is made with 2tb spinning disks.
>
> (i don't have support for nvme on these old servers)
>
> Il dom 26 nov 2023, 23:52 Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
>>
>> On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 23:22:51 +0100
>> Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Il giorno dom 26 nov 2023 alle ore 13:22 Wols Lists
>> > <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
>> > > If you look at what SMR is, it's only relevant to spinning rust. It
>> > > relies on the fact that a read head can be much smaller than a write
>> > > head, so provided you shingle your writes (hence the name), you can
>> > > over-write half the previous track (so saving space) without rendering
>> > > the data unreadable.
>> >
>> > Thank you all.
>> > That's what i've thought but better stay safe than sorry so i've asked.
>> >
>> > In other words WD Red SSD are safe for a RAID, there is no need to change them
>> > (as mostly new) in both array (the grow was finished 1 hour ago: 2 WD
>> > Gold SATA 3.5 plus 1 WD RED SSD)
>> >
>> > Slowly, i'll replace all spinning disks with WD Red SSD
>> > I'm not a fan of WD, but 2TB disks able to replace a 2TB HDD are very
>> > very rare (the 1.92TB, much more common, can't replace a 2TB disk)
>>
>> There are three grades of capacity that you can get:
>> 1) ~1920 000 000 000 bytes
>> 2) ~2000 000 000 000 bytes
>> 3) ~2048 000 000 000 bytes
>>
>> Nobody is marketing the 1st variant as "2TB", you will find "1920G" on the
>> packaging and datasheets instead.
>>
>> 2nd one should be able to replace an HDD, unless there's some smaller
>> discrepancy in the sizes near the 2 billion byte mark between HDDs and SSDs. A
>> reason to use smaller-than-whole-disk partitions for your RAID.
>>
>> 3rd is not a common sight in SATA SSDs (but still happens), and is nearly
>> universal in NVMe. Of about ten "2 TB" NVMe models I've tested, only one had
>> 2000, *all* others were 2048. The 2000 one was Netac NV7000.
>>
>> --
>> With respect,
>> Roman




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux