Re: RAID5 failure and consequent ext4 problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Yes.  Same kernels are pretty repeatable for device order on bootup as
> long as all are present.  Anything missing will shift the letter 
> assignments.

Every time I think about this I find myself amayzed that it does seem to
be so stable, and wonder how that can be.  The drives are all enumerated
in paralell these days so the order they get assigned in should be a
total crap shoot, shouldn't it?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux