On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 2022-05-22 23:41, Donald Buczek wrote: > >> Looks like bfq or block issue, will try it from my side. > > > > FYI: I've used loop devices on a virtio disk. > > > > I later discovered Logans patches [1], which I were not aware of, as I'm not subscribed to the lists. > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/20220519191311.17119-6-logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u > > > > The series seems to acknowledge that there are open problems and tries to fix them. > > So I've used his md-bug branch from https://github.com/sbates130272/linux-p2pmem but it didn't look better. > > > > So I understand, the mdadm tests *are* supposed to work and every bug I see here is worth analyzing? Or is Logan hunting down everything anyway? > > I'm not hunting down everything. There's too much brokenness. I've done > a bunch of work: there's that series plus an mdadm branch I'll send to > the list later (just linked it on my previous email). But even after all > that, I still have ~25 broken tests, but I've marked those tests and > they shouldn't stop the test script from running everything. Thanks for your fixes so far. I will work with Jes to look into the remaining failures and develop plan to fix them. Song
