On 2022-05-22 23:41, Donald Buczek wrote: >> Looks like bfq or block issue, will try it from my side. > > FYI: I've used loop devices on a virtio disk. > > I later discovered Logans patches [1], which I were not aware of, as I'm not subscribed to the lists. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/20220519191311.17119-6-logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u > > The series seems to acknowledge that there are open problems and tries to fix them. > So I've used his md-bug branch from https://github.com/sbates130272/linux-p2pmem but it didn't look better. > > So I understand, the mdadm tests *are* supposed to work and every bug I see here is worth analyzing? Or is Logan hunting down everything anyway? I'm not hunting down everything. There's too much brokenness. I've done a bunch of work: there's that series plus an mdadm branch I'll send to the list later (just linked it on my previous email). But even after all that, I still have ~25 broken tests, but I've marked those tests and they shouldn't stop the test script from running everything. Logan
