Re: [PATCH] mdadm/systemd: change KillMode from none to mixed in service files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 09 Dec 2021, Franck Bui wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 12/7/21 1:34 PM, Benjamin Brunner wrote:
> >>>> Please correct me if I am wrong, I see the difference of the KillMode is,
> >>>> -- KillMode=mixed stops the processes more gentally, it kill the main
> >>>> process with SIGTERM and the remaining processes with SIGKILL.
> >>>> -- KillMode=control-group kills all in-cgroup processes with SIGKILL,
> >>>> which I feel a bit cruel for the main process.
> 
> I think there's a miss-understanding here.
> 
> Regardless of whether "mixed" or "control-group" mode (or any other mode
> actually) is used, the process used to kill processes part of a service is
> always the same, only the list of the killed processes differs.
> 
> The process is as follow:
> 
>  1. send the signal specified by KillSignal= to the list of processes (if
>     any), TERM is the default
>  2. wait until either the target of process(es) exit or a timeout expires
>  3. if the timeout expires send the signal specified by FinalKillSignal=,
>     KILL is the default
> 
> For "control-group", all remaining processes will receive the SIGTERM signal (by
> default) and if there are still processes after a period f time, they will get
> the SIGKILL signal.
> 
> For "mixed", only the main process will receive the SIGTERM signal, and if there
> are still processes after a period of time, all remaining processes (including
> the main one) will receive the SIGKILL signal.
> 
> >>> There is no point sending SIGTERM to a process which doesn't respond to
> >>> it.  mdmon is the only mdadm service which handles SIGTERM.  So it might
> >>> make sense to uise KillMode=mixed for that.
> >>> For anything else, SIGKILL via KillMode=control-group is perfectly
> >>> acceptable.
> 
> I don't know enough mdadm to suggest a mode but maybe the clarification above
> will help you figuring this out.
> 
> That said it sounds a bit strange that some processes don't respond to SIGTERM.
> Is that done because some services need to run lately during the shutdown process ?

When I wrote that they don't respond to SIGTERM, I meant that they don't
take any special action.  They don't ignore SIGTERM, so they will exit
when they are sent it.  i.e.  it doesn't matter whether they get SIGTERM
or SIGKILL - either way they will exit.

NeilBrown




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux