Re: [PATCH] md/raid5: reduce lock contention in read_one_chunk()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just a second thought

> Since it only impacts quiesce now, I thought it'd be better to use spinlock afterall.
> Please let me know if you think otherwise.
Since slow path is only at quiesce, I can remove aligned_reads_lock altogether and use device_lock like before.
What do you think ?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux