Re: raid10 redundancy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > It depends on which layout do you use and the copies you specify. There
> > is a detailed description in `man md 3`
>
> Thanks a lot for the hint. After studying the pattern I think n2 and
> o2 could survive if losing two correct disks with 4 or 5 disks. but f2
> will be dead. is my understanding correct?

it seems not correct. I check the pattern again. I found all
layout(n2,o2,f2) tend to put second copy to neighbor disk.

so if I link all disks as a circle ring, I will be safe if there are
no two disks nearby are dead.
in other words: if a disk is dead, but the two neighbor disks around
it are alive, then I will be safe.
hope this time the logic is correct....


.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux