Re: raid10 redundancy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I guess it depends on your definition of raid 10... In my experience it means one or more raid 1 arrays combine with raid 0, so if each raid 1 arrays had 2 members, then it is either 2, 4, 6, etc for the total number of drives.

indeed. What I want to use is linux raid10 which can be used on
2,3,4,5, etc of disk drives. so it is unlike hardware raid 10.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux