Re: [PATCH 1/1] mdadm/bitmap: locate bitmap calcuate bitmap position wrongly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/25/20 8:43 PM, heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 11/26/20 7:18 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> On 10/30/20 2:44 AM, heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> You are right. Only cluster case can trigger your patch code.
>>> Hardcode 4096 is correct.
>>
>> Just catching up, was the conclusion the original patch was correct?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jes
>>
> Xiao's patch (original patch) is correct.
> 
> Thanks.

Applied!

Thanks,
Jes


>>
>>> On 10/30/20 1:53 PM, Xiao Ni wrote:
>>>> Hi Heming
>>>>
>>>> The cluster raid is only supported by super 1.2, so we don't need to consider the old system when
>>>> it's a cluster raid.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Xiao
>>>>
>>>> On 10/28/2020 08:29 PM, heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>> Hello Xiao,
>>>>>
>>>>> My review comment:
>>>>> You code only work in modern system. the boundary is 4k not 512, because using hardcode 4k to call calc_bitmap_size
>>>>>
>>>>> In current cluster env, if bitmap area beyond 4K size (or 512 in very old system), locate_bitmap1
>>>>> will return wrong address.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please refer write_bitmap1() to saparate 512 & 4096 case.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/28/20 2:04 PM, Xiao Ni wrote:
>>>>>> Now it only adds bitmap offset based on cluster nodes. It's not right. It needs to
>>>>>> add per node bitmap space to find next node bitmap position.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     super1.c | 12 +++++++++---
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
>>>>>> index 8b0d6ff..b5b379b 100644
>>>>>> --- a/super1.c
>>>>>> +++ b/super1.c
>>>>>> @@ -2582,8 +2582,9 @@ add_internal_bitmap1(struct supertype *st,
>>>>>>     static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
>>>>>>     {
>>>>>> -    unsigned long long offset;
>>>>>> +    unsigned long long offset, bm_sectors_per_node;
>>>>>>         struct mdp_superblock_1 *sb;
>>>>>> +    bitmap_super_t *bms;
>>>>>>         int mustfree = 0;
>>>>>>         int ret;
>>>>>> @@ -2598,8 +2599,13 @@ static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
>>>>>>             ret = 0;
>>>>>>         else
>>>>>>             ret = -1;
>>>>>> -    offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset);
>>>>>> -    offset += (int32_t) __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset) * (node_num + 1);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset) + __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset);
>>>>>> +    if (node_num) {
>>>>>> +        bms = (bitmap_super_t*)(((char*)sb)+MAX_SB_SIZE);
>>>>>> +        bm_sectors_per_node = calc_bitmap_size(bms, 4096) >> 9;
>>>>>> +        offset += bm_sectors_per_node * node_num;
>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>>         if (mustfree)
>>>>>>             free(sb);
>>>>>>         lseek64(fd, offset<<9, 0);
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux