On 8/29/20 12:38 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 8/26/20 10:16 AM, Lidong Zhong wrote: >> ... >> So the misleading "raid0" is shown in this testcase. I think maybe >> the "Raid Level" item shouldn't be displayed any more for the inactive >> array. > > As a system administrator, I'd much rather see "unknown" (or something > similar), rather than simply omitting the information. > Thanks for the suggestion. Yeah, just removing the Raid Level info is not the best option. I also considered to show it as "inactive Raid1" in such case. Anyway, I need to wait for Jes's review.
