Re: Recommended filesystem for RAID 6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:50:50PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:47 PM Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/08/20 20:19, Michael Fritscher wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > if you really want to use these tiny 2 TB HDDs - yes, RAID 6 (2x - the
> > > second for the backup system on a physically different location) is a
> > > good choice.
> > >
> > > But: If you can, buy some 8-12 TB HDDs and forget the old rusty tiny
> > > HDDs. You'll save a lot at the system - and power.
> > >
> > I'm looking at one of these ...
> > https://www.amazon.co.uk/Seagate-ST8000DM004-Barracuda-internal-Silver/dp/B075WYBQXJ/ref=pd_ybh_a_8?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=WF1CTS2K9RWY96D1RENJ
> >
> > Note that it IS a shingled drive, so fine for backup, much less so for
> > anything else.
> 
> How can you tell? From the spec, I can't find anything that indicates
> it. Let alone which of three varieties it is.
> https://www.seagate.com/www-content/product-content/barracuda-fam/barracuda-new/en-us/docs/100805918d.pdf

You can't from the spec[1], but you have this one[2] in the wake of WD
Red started to use SMR without telling anyone.

[1] https://blocksandfiles.com/2020/04/15/seagate-2-4-and-8tb-barracuda-and-desktop-hdd-smr/
[2] https://www.seagate.com/gb/en/internal-hard-drives/cmr-smr-list/


-- 
Kai Stian Olstad
PS: Sorry Chris, you get this twice, I forgot reply-to-all.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux