Re: Recommended filesystem for RAID 6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/08/20 20:19, Michael Fritscher wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> if you really want to use these tiny 2 TB HDDs - yes, RAID 6 (2x - the
> second for the backup system on a physically different location) is a
> good choice.
> 
> But: If you can, buy some 8-12 TB HDDs and forget the old rusty tiny
> HDDs. You'll save a lot at the system - and power.
> 
I'm looking at one of these ...
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Seagate-ST8000DM004-Barracuda-internal-Silver/dp/B075WYBQXJ/ref=pd_ybh_a_8?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=WF1CTS2K9RWY96D1RENJ

Note that it IS a shingled drive, so fine for backup, much less so for
anything else. I'm not sure whether btrfs would be a good choice or not ...

> ext4 is fine. In my experience, it is rock-solid, and also fsck.ext4 is
> fairly qick (don't know what Roy is doing that it is so slow - do you
> really made a full-fledged ext4 with journal or a old ext2 file system?^^)
> 
> Another way would be deploying zfs with raid-z2 (Yes, I can hear the
> screams :-D )
> 
Cheers,
Wol




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux