Re: Software RAID6 broke after power outage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/22/20 2:41 AM, Cory Derenburger wrote:
[    2.863538] ata3.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x10 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
[    2.863594] ata3.00: irq_stat 0x40000008
[    2.863643] ata3.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED
[    2.863695] ata3.00: cmd 60/08:20:08:08:00/00:00:00:00:00/40 tag 4
ncq 4096 in
[    2.863695]          res 41/40:00:09:08:00/00:00:00:00:00/40 Emask
0x409 (media error) <F>
[    2.863775] ata3.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
[    2.863822] ata3.00: error: { UNC }
[    2.873407] ata3.00: configured for UDMA/133
[    2.873476] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] Unhandled sense code
[    2.873525] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc]
[    2.873571] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
[    2.873619] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc]
[    2.873665] Sense Key : Medium Error [current] [descriptor]
[    2.873819] Descriptor sense data with sense descriptors (in hex):
[    2.873901]         72 03 11 04 00 00 00 0c 00 0a 80 00 00 00 00 00
[    2.874544]         00 00 08 09
[    2.874764] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc]
[    2.874811] Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error - auto reallocate failed
[    2.874895] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] CDB:
[    2.874941] Read(10): 28 00 00 00 08 08 00 00 08 00
[    2.875428] end_request: I/O error, dev sdc, sector 2057

That's an error on sdc all right.

[    2.875478] Buffer I/O error on device sdc1, logical block 1

Note that this refers to sdc1, the first partition on sdc.

cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5]
[raid4] [raid10]
md0 : inactive sdb1[0](S) sde1[3](S) sdd1[2](S)
       5860147464 blocks super 1.2

Note that this is again referring to *partitions* (sdb1, sde1, sdd1),
not the whole disks.  So your faulty RAID member is *sdc1* (not sdc).

Below running mdstat for sdc.  Checking sdb, sdd, sde appear fine.

mdadm --examine /dev/sdc
/dev/sdc:   MBR Magic : aa55
Partition[0] :   3907027120 sectors at         2048 (type fd)

That's expected.  sdc isn't a RAID device.

mdadm --examine /dev/sdc1
mdadm: No md superblock detected on /dev/sdc1.

That's not good (but we already knew that the drive is unhappy).

Is there other information needed to determine the issue?  Where do I
go from here?

What does mdadm --detail /dev/md0 say?

--
========================================================================
                 In Soviet Russia, Google searches you!
========================================================================




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux