Re: RAID types & chunks sizes for new NAS drives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:01 PM John Stoffel <john@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

MEC 2548HT

>
> >>>>> "o1bigtenor" == o1bigtenor  <o1bigtenor@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> o1bigtenor> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:06 PM John Stoffel <john@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> o1bigtenor> snip
>
> >> In any case, make sure you get NAS rated disks, either the newest WD
> >> RED+ (or is it Blue?)  In any case, make sure to NOT get the SMR
> >> (Shingled Magnetic Recording) format drives.  See previous threads in
> >> this group, as well as the arstechnica.com discussion about it all
> >> that they disk last month.  Very informative.
> >>
> >> Personally, with regular hard disks, I still kinda think 4gb is the
> >> sweet spot, since you can just mirror pairs of the disks and then
> >> stripe across on top as needed.  I like my storage simple, because
> >> when (not if!) it all hits the fan, simple is easier to recover from.
> >>
> o1bigtenor> Did you mean 4 TB or 4 GB as you wrote?
> o1bigtenor> (Somewhat of a difference I do believe.)
>
> LOL!  I meant 4Tb of course... but I do remember when 10mb HDs were
> amazing... :-)

I can remember buying a 40 MB drive where the serial number and drive
information
was hand lettered - - - - That was when 5s were sorta common and 10 MB was
thought to be BIG. Oh well - - - thought it was just a typo but prefer
to make sure of
details!!!

Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux