Re: [PATCH] mdadm.8: add note information for raid0 growing operation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019/11/7 12:45 上午, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 05/11/19 13:15, Coly Li wrote:
>> On 2019/11/5 9:00 下午, Wols Lists wrote:
>>> On 05/11/19 12:44, Coly Li wrote:
>>>>>> are devices number before and  after  the grow operation, "* 2" comes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> device numbers
>>>> Copied. I am not sure whether it should be "device numbers" or maybe
>>>> "devices numbers", this confuses me *^_^*
>>>>
>>> It is "device numbers".
>>>
>>> The trick for English is to ask yourself what is the singular form. Here
>>> it is "device number". Then convert that to plural by adding an "s" at
>>> the end.
>>>
>>
>> Let me explain why I am confused.
>>
>> Because the raid0 device can be combined by many disks, there will be
>> multiple component devices, so I think the number should be "component
>> disks number". Then I mentioned old and new numbers, there are two
>> numbers, so I am not sure whether I should use "devices numbers",
>> because devices means multiple component devices, and numbers means
>> there are two numbers (one for old, one for new).
>>
>>> English never "doubles up" as far as I'm aware (and I bet someone comes
>>> up with an obscure example where it does :-)
>>>
>>
>> By the above explanation, is it still "device numbers" ?
>>
> Yup I think it is :-)
> 
> It gets complicated ... :-) But I presume you mean a device can have two
> different numbers, one from before the change and one after. In which
> case it is "device numbers".
> 
> "devices numbers" is grammatically wrong full stop, but you could have a
> possessive device(s), as in "device's numbers" (singular device) or
> "devices' numbers" (several devices).
> 
> English is a tricky language, not because it has that many or
> complicated rules (it doesn't), but because it's stolen so many words
> and rules from other languages that you're forever tripping up on
> something that doesn't follow the usual rules ... :-)

Hi Wols,

Thank you for the detailed explanation. Then it seems "devices' numbers"
is easier for me to understand *^_^*

I will post another updated version. Good to learn English language
knowledge here :-)

Coly Li




-- 

Coly Li



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux