Re: [RFC] Assemble: keep MD_DISK_FAILFAST flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 05 2018, Gioh Kim wrote:

> Before updating superblock of slave disks, desired_state value
> is set for the target state of the slave disks. But it forgets
> to check MD_DISK_FAILFAST flag. Then start_arrays() calls
> ADD_NEW_DISK ioctl-call and pass the state without MD_DISK_FAILFAST.
>
> Currenlty it does not generate any problem because kernel does not
> care MD_DISK_FAILFAST flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Assemble.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Assemble.c b/Assemble.c
> index a79466c..fc0d464 100644
> --- a/Assemble.c
> +++ b/Assemble.c
> @@ -1704,6 +1704,9 @@ try_again:
>  		else
>  			desired_state = (1<<MD_DISK_ACTIVE) | (1<<MD_DISK_SYNC);
>  
> +		if (devices[j].i.disk.state & (1<<MD_DISK_FAILFAST))
> +			desired_state |= (1<<MD_DISK_FAILFAST);
> +
>  		if (!devices[j].uptodate)
>  			continue;
>  

This looks right, but I think we should preserve MD_DISK_WRITEMOSTLY as
well.
So maybe
  desired_state |= devices[j].i.disk_state & ((1<<MD_DISK_FAILFAST) |
                                              (1<<MD_DISK_WRITEMOSTLY));

NeilBrown

> -- 
> 2.14.1

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux