On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:57:21PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2018-07-16 17:37:27 [-0700], Shaohua Li wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 02:27:40PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > On 2018-07-03 22:01:36 [+0200], To linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > From: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > The irqsave variant of atomic_dec_and_lock handles irqsave/restore when > > > > taking/releasing the spin lock. With this variant the call of > > > > local_irq_save is no longer required. > > > > > > Shaohua, are you with this? > > > > Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Thank you. > Is there a reason why you did not apply it or are you too busy now and > do it later (and just signal the ack that you are fine with it)? Since you sent a series, I suppose you want someone else to take it. But I can take it for sure, will do soon. Thanks, Shaohua -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
