On 01/03/2018 10:59 AM, Alexander Shenkin wrote: > On 1/3/2018 3:53 PM, Phil Turmel wrote: >> On 01/03/2018 08:50 AM, Alexander Shenkin wrote: >>> On 1/3/2018 1:26 PM, Brad Campbell wrote: >> >>>> Nope. Your pending is still at 8, so you've got bad sectors in an area >>>> of the drive that hasn't been dealt with. What is "interesting" is >>>> that your SMART test results don't list the LBA of the first failure. >>>> Disappointing behaviour on the part of the disk. They are within the >>>> 1st 10% of the drive however, so it wouldn't surprise me if they were >>>> in an unused portion of the RAID superblock area. >>> >>> Thanks Brad. So, to theoretically get these sectors remapped so I don't >>> keep getting errors, I would have to somehow try to write to those >>> sectors. That's tough given that the LBA's aren't reported as you >>> mention. Perhaps my best course of action then is to: >> >> No, just use dd to read that device -- it'll bail out with read error >> when it hits the trouble spot, which will report the affected sector. >> Then you can rewrite it with the appropriate seek= value. (Assuming it >> really is in an unused part of the member device.) > > Thanks Phil. So, just: dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=512 Yup. (-: Phil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
