Re: RAID header in XFS area?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 04.11.2017 um 20:27 schrieb Wol's lists:
On 04/11/17 18:34, Reindl Harald wrote:
What's happened is that mdadm has assembled the array, realised a disk
is missing, AND STOPPED.

why would it be supposed that a simple mirror with a mising disk is stopped while the whole point of mirroring is to not care about one of the disks dying?

While the system is RUNNING, yes. But if the array is STOPPED, mdadm will refuse to start it. At least, that's certainly how I understand it works ...

Do you REALLY want the system to be running, and give you no clue that it's not working properly?

mdmon typically writes a mail about a degraded array - so far away from "no clue"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux