Re: RAID header in XFS area?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 04.11.2017 um 19:30 schrieb Wols Lists:
mdadm did exactly what it is supposed to do. A mirror with one drive is
degraded, so it assembled the array AND STOPPED. Once you force it past
this point, I think it will happily go past again no problem, but it's
designed to refuse to proceed with a damaged array, if the array was
fully okay previous time.

So, in other words, the disk and everything else is fine.

What's happened is that mdadm has assembled the array, realised a disk
is missing, AND STOPPED.

why would it be supposed that a simple mirror with a mising disk is stopped while the whole point of mirroring is to not care about one of the disks dying?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux