On 07/08/2017 06:15 AM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 19:41:13 -0500
Ram Ramesh <rramesh2400@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On the web, I only found one solution that required upgrading kernel to
some very recent one (not in my distro) and getting the bleeding edge
resize2fs. This makes me nervous. Is there a solution that avoids this.
Considering the other possible options that have been mentioned, using the
Ext4 built-in larger devices support (which has been implemented recently)
seems to be your best bet.
https://askubuntu.com/questions/779754/how-do-i-resize-an-ext4-partition-beyond-the-16tb-limit
The required e2fsprogs version 1.43 is included in Ubuntu 16.10 by now, so you
don't even need to build it from the source.
https://packages.ubuntu.com/yakkety/e2fsprogs
But really, if you have everything on one array with a single huge filesystem
and no backups, that's just asking for trouble and a complete data loss.
Thanks. This is exactly the one that I was talking about as a web
solution. Did not know it is available in 16.10.
Besides the above, I hear your last caution well. I do have backup by
distributing files using rsync over multiple (old) disks (4+4+3+3TB). I
just don't trust my back up and thus pretend that I do not have one.
However, for a short one week trial, I think, I am ok.
Going forward, I will not be able to backup 24TB volume (if I succeed in
building one big MD) as I will not have enough drives to distribute
data. So, there is going to be a problem. So, I am thinking seriously
building several smaller MD devices out of my 6x6TB drives. Look at my
reply to Andreas. Let me know your thoughts on that. If I build smaller
MDs each can be temporarily backed up for updates etc. So, I will still
be ok with data as long as I work only on one MD at a time that fits my
set of backup disks.
Ramesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
