Re: How important is SCTERC?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> [ ... ] I do run tler.sh that sets 180s timeout for drives
> that do not have scterc from /etc/rc.local. Am I putting my
> data in serious danger?

No.

> I only have videos and tv recordings in this md

The problem with SCT/ERC absence is that the 2-3 minutes of
retries suspend IO for that long, and for people running
interactive applications (usually LAMP-style web applications)
that is a bad idea, but in your case you seem to have just a
personal archive of entertainment files.

For interactive "enterprise" applications the common practice is
to reduce the error timeout to 1-2 seconds, so the failing drive
drops out of the MD set quickly and can be replaced, minimizing
delays.

> which can be replaced with significant effort (about 12TB of
> movies and tv shows will take some time to copy from my
> DVDs/BDs)

Backups are very important, and RAID is not an alternative to
backups. You can buy and use SMR disk drives as if they were
tapes (or with a filesystem like NILFS2) to do that backup, and
they are quite cheap.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux