Re: Can we deprecate ioctl(RAID_VERSION)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10 Apr 2017, NeilBrown verbalised:

> On Fri, Apr 07 2017, jes.sorensen@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Next question since I am wearing my 'what is this old stuff doing' hat.
>> mdassemble? Does anything still use this? The reason is a lot of the
>> newer features are explicitly included, and switching to sysfs is
>> effectively going to kill it, unless it gets a major upgrade.
>>
>
> I was never a big fan, of mdassemble, but it is smaller than mdadm and
> some people apparently have (or had) space-constrained boot
> environments.

It also has fewer build-time requirements and can build on systems with
things like old buggy versions of uclibc that can't build a working
mdadm. (Of course, now musl exists, I'm not sure anyone should care
about that. I stopped caring many years ago.)

-- 
NULL && (void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux