Re: proactive disk replacement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:03:51PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> but the point is that with RAID5/6 the recovery itself is *heavy random 
> IO* and that get *combined* with the random IO auf the normal workload 
> and that means *heavy load on the disks*

Where do you get that random I/O idea from? Rebuild is linear.
Or what do you mean by random I/O in this context? (RAID rebuilds)
What kind of random things do you think the RAID is doing?

If you see read errors during rebuild, the most common cause is 
that the rebuild also happens to be the first read test since forever. 
(Happens to be the case for people who don't do any disk monitoring.)

> here you go: http://www.zdnet.com/article/why-raid-6-stops-working-in-2019/

This is just wrong.

Regards
Andreas Klauer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux