On 2017/2/21 上午2:14, Wols Lists wrote: > On 20/02/17 08:07, Coly Li wrote: >> For the function pointer asignment, it is because I see a brach happens in a loop. If I use a function pointer, I can avoid redundant brach inside the loop. raid1_read_request() and raid1_write_request() are not simple functions, I don't know whether gcc may make them inline or not, so I am on the way to check the disassembled code.. > > Can you force gcc to inline or compile a function? Isn't it dangerous to > rely on default behaviour and assume it won't change when the compiler > is upgraded? I choose to trust compiler, and trust the people behind gcc. Coly -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
