Re: Inactive arrays

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13/09/16 21:36, Daniel Sanabria wrote:
> [root@lamachine ~]# mdadm -D /dev/sd*
> mdadm: /dev/sda does not appear to be an md device
> mdadm: /dev/sda1 does not appear to be an md device
> mdadm: /dev/sda2 does not appear to be an md device
> mdadm: /dev/sda3 does not appear to be an md device
> mdadm: /dev/sda5 does not appear to be an md device
> mdadm: /dev/sda6 does not appear to be an md device
> mdadm: /dev/sdb does not appear to be an md device

I think that it's been pointed out, but this should be "mdadm -E".

"mdadm -E" gets passed physical devices eg /dev/sda, "mdadm -D" gets
passed raid devices eg /dev/md127.

Confusing, I know ...

Cheers,
Wol
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux