Re: [PATCH v2] mdadm: fix a buffer overflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sounds good. Let me resend. 
 
Thanks,
Song


>> On 9/8/16, 10:56 AM, "Shaohua Li" <shli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 05:43:35PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
    > struct mdp_superblock_1.set_name is 32B long, but struct mdinfo.name
    > is 33B long. So we need strncpy instead strcpy to avoid buffer
    > overflow.
    > 
    > Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
    > ---
    >  super1.c | 4 ++--
    >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
    > 
    > diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
    > index f3e4023..46fed54 100644
    > --- a/super1.c
    > +++ b/super1.c
    > @@ -1294,7 +1294,7 @@ static int update_super1(struct supertype *st, struct mdinfo *info,
    >  			strcat(sb->set_name, ":");
    >  			strcat(sb->set_name, info->name);
    >  		} else
    > -			strcpy(sb->set_name, info->name);
    > +			strncpy(sb->set_name, info->name, 32);
    
    strncpy(sb->set_name, info->name, sizeof(sb->set_name)); ?
    
    


��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����w��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux