[md PATCH 14/18] md/raid5: add rcu protection to rdev accesses in want_replace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Being in the middle of resync is no longer protection against failed
rdevs disappearing.  So add rcu protection.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/md/raid5.c |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index e9ad22d64bd7..7da89ee22a31 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -3239,15 +3239,16 @@ static int want_replace(struct stripe_head *sh, int disk_idx)
 {
 	struct md_rdev *rdev;
 	int rv = 0;
-	/* Doing recovery so rcu locking not required */
-	rdev = sh->raid_conf->disks[disk_idx].replacement;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	rdev = rcu_dereference(sh->raid_conf->disks[disk_idx].replacement);
 	if (rdev
 	    && !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags)
 	    && !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags)
 	    && (rdev->recovery_offset <= sh->sector
 		|| rdev->mddev->recovery_cp <= sh->sector))
 		rv = 1;
-
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return rv;
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux