Re: raid 5 crashed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 01/06/16 23:36, Wols Lists wrote:
On 01/06/16 05:07, Brad Campbell wrote:
I have however done a *lot* of data recovery on single drives over the
years and can absolutely vouch that dd will leave you in tears.
Good to know! I've regularly used dd on drives, but not on ones that
were in trouble (maybe once ...)

But now drives are at the point that you cannot guarantee an error-free
scan even on just one pass,
People keep saying that. I've never encountered it. I suspect it's just not the problem that the hysterical ranting makes it out to be (either that or the pile of cheap and nasty drives I have here are model citizens). I've *never* seen a read error unless the drive was in trouble, and that includes running dd reads in a loop over multiple days continuously. If it were that bad I'd see drives failing SMART long tests routinely also, and that does not happen either.

--

Dolphins are so intelligent that within a few weeks they can
train Americans to stand at the edge of the pool and throw them
fish.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux