Re: When do you replace old hard drives in a raid6?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/06/2016 08:31 PM, Weedy wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Ram Ramesh <rramesh2400@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 03/06/2016 06:29 PM, Phil Turmel wrote:
On 03/05/2016 03:49 PM, Ram Ramesh wrote:
I am curious if people actually replace hard drives periodically because
they are old or out of warranty. My 5 device raid6 has several older
drives (3/5 are 3+ years old and out of warranty) They seem fine with
SMART and raid scrubs. However, it makes me wonder when they will die.
What is the best policy in such situations? More importantly, do people
wait for disks to die and then replace or have some ad hoc schedule of
replacing (like every 6mo replace oldest) to keep things safe?
I replace drives when their relocation count hits double digits.  In my
limited sample, that's typically after 40,000 hours.

Phil

Thanks for the data point. 40K hours means roughly 4.5 years with 24/7. That
is very good. You use enterprise drives?
They don't have to be, cheap crap can last. My case slots the drives
in vertically with large silicone dampers, I feel like this helps.

Model Family:     Seagate Barracuda 7200.10
Device Model:     ST3320620AS
   5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   036    Pre-fail
Always       -       0
   9 Power_On_Hours          0x0032   040   040   000    Old_age
Always       -       52576

Model Family:     Seagate Barracuda 7200.10
Device Model:     ST3320620AS
   5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   036    Pre-fail
Always       -       0
   9 Power_On_Hours          0x0032   048   048   000    Old_age
Always       -       46196

Model Family:     Western Digital Caviar Black
Device Model:     WDC WD1001FALS-00E8B0
   5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   200   200   140    Pre-fail
Always       -       0
   9 Power_On_Hours          0x0032   039   039   000    Old_age
Always       -       44551


Model Family:     SAMSUNG SpinPoint F1 DT
Device Model:     SAMSUNG HD103UJ
   5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   010    Pre-fail
Always       -       10
   9 Power_On_Hours          0x0032   087   087   000    Old_age
Always       -       67735


Model Family:     Western Digital Caviar Black
Device Model:     WDC WD1001FALS-00E8B0
   5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   200   200   140    Pre-fail
Always       -       0
   9 Power_On_Hours          0x0032   040   040   000    Old_age
Always       -       44427

Model Family:     SAMSUNG SpinPoint F1 DT
Device Model:     SAMSUNG HD103UJ
   5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   010    Pre-fail
Always       -       6
   9 Power_On_Hours          0x0032   093   093   000    Old_age
Always       -       36570


I would say the biggest thing is how often you get a reallocated
sector. The Samsungs seem to get 1-3 a year, they will probably keep
doing that until they die. Past experience with seagate tells me I'm
going to get 10 in one day and the drive will die in a week. The WD
will probably throw a few at a time and I'll dump them when they get
to 10-15 sectors.
I hear you. I have not had any fails myself in my 20+ years. I have gotten rid of them because they became too small relative what market offered. Until recently, I had a working 8G (yes, 8G!) IBM IDE drive from my first computer (20+ years ago) It was a keepsake. They do not make them this tough these days. I am almost sure that a new seagate desktop 6TB is not going to last this long.

All said and done, I think I feel I have less to worry. Thanks for helping me to see that.

I run long selftest once a month and will watch the RAID scrubs and SMART values. I should be ok until I see my first reallocated sector hit. After that I will buy my replacements.

Ramesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux