Re: md failing mechanism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Since that was written, 'A' would now include almost-enterprise drives
with RAID ratings like the Western Digital Red family.  And the
recommended timeout for 'C' has drifted upward to 180.

Almost all posts mention WD Reds. It's NOT a recommendation, but seeing
as I've tended to buy Seagate (note my Barracudas) I looked for the
Seagate equivalent. They're called NAS drives, and they cost roughly the
same ... just pointing this out in case people like Seagate or dislike
WD ... :-)

I would prefer a Seagate over a WD, but with my experience lately, I don't want any more Seagates, either... I switched to Hitachi, but they don't make low-speed drives anymore, and they are expensive... I wonder of those Seagate NAS drives are actually anywhere near "reliable"?..


--
darkpenguin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux