Re: Reconstruct a RAID 6 that has failed in a non typical manner

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 06 2015, Phil Turmel wrote:
>
> for x in /sys/block/*/device/timeout ; do echo 180 > $x ; done
>

Would it make sense for mdadm to automagically do something like this?
i.e. whenever it adds a device to an array (with redundancy) it write
180 (or something configurable) to the 'timeout' file if there is one?

Why do we pick 180?
Can this cause problems on some drives?

Thanks,
NeilBrown

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux