Re: RAID 5,6 sequential writing seems slower in newer kernels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/03/2015 08:43 AM, Robert Kierski wrote:
> This is why I use Direct-IO to the bare metal block device instead of going through the FS.  Rather than discussing the real problem, we're off in the weed talking about whether the tests should be using O_SYNC and whether there is a problem introduced in the latest version of the FS.

It's not off in the weeds for Dallas, the OP.

> FS's and cache are very good at hiding the problems of those things below them and prevent you from exercising the code you're interested in debugging.

Yep, you seem to have a real problem.

Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux