RE: RAID 5,6 sequential writing seems slower in newer kernels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just for completeness... I should also mention that... 

The 32 core system has the AVX2 extension.  I've tried this on a 12 Core system without the AVX2 extension.  In that case, it's using SSE24 to do the xor.

I get pretty much the same results on either system.

Bob Kierski
Senior Storage Performance Engineer
Cray Inc.
380 Jackson Street
Suite 210
St. Paul, MN 55101
Tele: 651-967-9590
Fax:  651-605-9001
Cell: 651-890-7461


-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Turmel [mailto:philip@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 8:45 AM
To: Robert Kierski; Dallas Clement
Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RAID 5,6 sequential writing seems slower in newer kernels

On 12/02/2015 09:18 AM, Robert Kierski wrote:
> Sorry... I should have mentioned that I'm running the 3.18.4 kernel 
> with a 32 core xeon and 128G of memory.  I'm not using a FS, I'm going 
> directly to the raid block device.

I'm not sure if the parallelization of raid parity has been merged yet, but I'm pretty sure it isn't in 3.18.  With one core tied up computing parity and the rest idle, that'd be 96.875% idle.

Phil
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����w��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux