Re: [PATCH 1/2] Safeguard against writing to an active device of another node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Goryachev wrote:
> On 04/08/15 20:05, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
>   
>> Hi Goldwyn,
>>
>> Thanks for review.
>>
>> Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>>     
>>>> +    set_dlm_hookers(); /* get dlm funcs from libdlm_lt.so.3 */
>>>> +
>>>>         
>>> Universal Comment: Let call it set_dlm_hooks as opposed to hookers.
>>>
>>>       
>> Not sure I understood correctly, the second patch used set_hookers to
>> call set_dlm_hookers.
>>     
>
> I think Neil meant to ask you to please do a global s/hookers/hooks/
> because hooker has a particular meaning in english which is different to
> what you intended.
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hooker
>
> Hope that helps.
>   
Got it, thanks for the website, will change it.

Thanks,
Guoqing


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux