Re: Issue removing failed drive and re adding on raid 6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/07/15 07:10, Justin Stephenson wrote:
> ata6.00: ATA-8: ST3000DM001-9YN166, CC4H, max UDMA/133
> ata6.00: 5860533168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32), AA
> ata7.00: ATA-9: ST3000DM001-1CH166, CC27, max UDMA/133
> ata7.00: 5860533168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32), AA
> ata8.00: ATA-9: ST3000DM001-1CH166, CC27, max UDMA/133
> ata8.00: 5860533168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32), AA
> ata5.00: ATA-9: ST3000DM001-1CH166, CC27, max UDMA/133
> ata5.00: 5860533168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32), AA
> ata6.00: configured for UDMA/133
> ata4.00: ATA-9: ST3000DM001-1CH166, CC27, max UDMA/133
> ata4.00: 5860533168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32), AA

OWWWWW OWWWWWW OWWWWW

Are these 3TB Seagate Barracudas? (Same as mine). You DO NOT want to be
running raid 5 or 6 on these things !!!! They're desktop drives not
meant for raid.

They do not support ERC. *One* *soft* failure on these and you run a
good chance of trashing your array !!!!

Make sure you've got your raid timeout increased - there's plenty of
threads about how to do it - otherwise one disk hiccup for any reason is
likely to cause a cascade of failures !!!!

You need to upgrade them to Western Digital Reds or similar asap.

Cheers,
Wol
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux