Re: doubts about sdd raid1 and cfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hum, but what about the 850 version instead of 840?

2015-06-13 17:14 GMT-03:00 Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2015, Roberto Spadim wrote:
>
>> hi guys, i`m setting up a new server, it have
>> 1) 2x 256gb sdd
>> Samsung SSD 850 PRO 256GB, EXM02B6Q
>> 500118192 sectors, multi 1: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
>> 2)1tb hdd
>> Hitachi HUA722010CLA330, JP4OA3EA
>> 1953525168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
>>
>> i`m plannig a raid1 with ssd and hdd, hdd being a "write-mostly", and
>> 750gb of hdd i will use to backup or other useless files
>>
>> i have somedoubts about the setup..
>> i use xfs at filesystem, should i consider TRIM command at filesystem?
>> the problem is hdd being part of raid1 setup with others ssd, could
>> the ssd receive the TRIM and the hdd too?
>> any idea is wellcome
>
>
> Frankly, reading about the firmware problems on Samsung SSDs in combination
> with TRIM, I would recommend against using TRIM on samsung drives.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fstrim/+bug/1449005
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@xxxxxxxxx



-- 
Roberto Spadim
SPAEmpresarial - Software ERP
Eng. Automação e Controle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux