Re: write performance of HW RAID VS MD RAID

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:59:10 -0700
Ming Lin <mlin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:27:07 -0700
> > Ming Lin <mlin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi NeilBrown,
> >>
> >> As you may already see, I run a lot of tests with 10 HDDs for the patchset
> >> "simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs"
> >>
> >> Here is the summary.
> >> http://minggr.net/pub/20150608/fio_results/summary.log
> >>
> >> MD RAID6 read performance is OK.
> >> But write performance is much lower than HW RAID6.
> >>
> >> Is it a known issue?
> >
> > It is not unexpected.
> > There are two likely reasons.
> > One is that HW RAID cards often have on-board NVRAM which is used as a
> > write-behind cache.  This allows better throughput by hiding latency and more
> > often gathering full-stripe writes.  HW RAID cards may also have accelerators
> > for the parity calculations, but that is not likely to make a big difference.
> > What sort of RAID6 controller do you have?
> 
> PERC H730 Mini

http://www.dell.com/learn/us/en/04/campaigns/dell-raid-controllers
   1GB NV Flash Backed Cache on the H730

That would explain a lot of performance difference for writes.

NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux